Models of different categories of technological singularity
Anders Sandberg, Future of Humanity Institute
The set of concepts today commonly referred to as “technological
singularity” has a long history in the computer science community. Concerns
about automated reasoning outpacing human reasoning can be found in Samuel
Butler’s Erewhon (1872), John von Neumann and Stanislaw Ulam conversed in the
1950’s on how ever accelerating progress would lead to “some essential
singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know
them, could not continue”, and I.J. Good in 1965 delineated the possibility of
an “intelligence explosion” where sufficiently advanced artificial intelligence
would rapidly self-improve.
Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment contains authoritative essays and critical commentaries on central questions relating to accelerating technological progress and the notion of technological singularity, focusing on conjectures about the intelligence explosion, transhumanism, and whole brain emulation
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible (Arthur C. Clarke's 2nd law)
Showing posts with label mathematics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mathematics. Show all posts
Tuesday, 12 July 2011
Saturday, 5 February 2011
Mathematical singularity and technological singularity (Yoram Hirshfeld)
(Read the complete post)
In the discussion of civilization and technology and their development in time, some terms with mathematical origin are used, specifically "singularity" and "exponential growth". There is some relation by association between objects with the same name in two different disciplines, but they usually do not mean the same. It would be very strange, if a philosopher of human behavior would try to apply Euclid's theory to love triangles, or if a geometer would launch into a long explanation why Euclid's mathematics is not relevant to this kind of triangles. Ironically, I find myself doing it; writing a note insisting that mathematical singularity has no bearing on the research of technological singularity. I will explain what is a mathematical singularity, and what exponential growth is, and is not. I can guarantee that the mathematics in the note is correct, but the philosophical claims are intuitive, based on common sense and on merely mild mathematical expertise. (Read more)
In the discussion of civilization and technology and their development in time, some terms with mathematical origin are used, specifically "singularity" and "exponential growth". There is some relation by association between objects with the same name in two different disciplines, but they usually do not mean the same. It would be very strange, if a philosopher of human behavior would try to apply Euclid's theory to love triangles, or if a geometer would launch into a long explanation why Euclid's mathematics is not relevant to this kind of triangles. Ironically, I find myself doing it; writing a note insisting that mathematical singularity has no bearing on the research of technological singularity. I will explain what is a mathematical singularity, and what exponential growth is, and is not. I can guarantee that the mathematics in the note is correct, but the philosophical claims are intuitive, based on common sense and on merely mild mathematical expertise. (Read more)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)